In the 1930s, the German government took steps to remove Jews from leadership and academic power in universities, placing control in the hands of the German population. This became one of the most discussed and condemned chapters in history, with Germans accused of anti-Semitism and cruelty toward the Jewish people. We are constantly reminded to condemn this period and the actions taken to protect German society.

However, the modern reality shows that similar processes are happening in the academic circles of the U.S., without the same condemnation. Today, in American universities, particularly in the Ivy League and other elite institutions, there is an active and targeted replacement of non-Jews with Jews. These actions not only go unprotested but often remain unnoticed by the public. Why is the exclusion of Jews in the 1930s seen as a crime, while similar actions by Jews today go unnoticed?

Elite American educational institutions have a tremendous influence on the country’s entire academic environment, shaping its structure, policies, and direction. Among these universities — Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, and others — there is a disturbing trend where Jewish leadership and Jewish interests dominate. This is not just a case of random replacements or professional decisions, but a systematic replacement of non-Jews with Jews or their supporters in academic and administrative power.

For example, at Harvard, Alan Garber, a Jew, became president after non-Jew Claudine Gay was removed for failing to suppress pro-Palestinian protests on campus. She was ousted by Jewish sponsors who were unhappy with her actions in defense of free speech, including for pro-Palestinian activists. A similar situation occurred at Yale, where Zionist Mori McInnis replaced Jewish Peter Salovey. McInnis actively supports the Jewish lobby, including arresting pro-Palestinian protesters and securing large donations from Jewish funds. This clearly shows that academic leadership is now closely tied to an organization promoting Jewish interests.

Princeton University is also headed by a Jew — Christopher L. Eisgruber, who has long promoted policies favorable to Jewish sponsors and influence agents. At Columbia University, Katrina Armstrong replaced Minouche Shafik, an American of Egyptian descent, who was not tough enough in suppressing pro-Palestinian sentiments. Armstrong received approval from Jewish circles for her more aggressive stance against Palestinian protests.

This trend is also visible at other Ivy League schools. At the University of Pennsylvania, Larry Jameson replaced Liz Magill, who was ousted by Jewish sponsors for failing to strictly control pro-Palestinian sentiments on campus. At Dartmouth, Jewish Sian Beilock actively targets those who oppose Israeli policies, and at Brown and Cornell, the situation is similar: Jewish leadership is replacing non-Jewish presidents with Zionist policy supporters.

Outside the Ivy League, the same situation is observed at other prestigious universities. At Stanford, known as the "Western Ivy League school," Jonathan Levin, a Jew, became president, with his family already having long-standing influence in academic circles. His father, Rick Levin, was president of Yale University, demonstrating the long-term Jewish influence on the management of the country’s largest educational institutions. At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sally Kornbluth, a Jew, took the helm of one of America’s leading technical institutes. At the California Institute of Technology (Cal-Tech), Thomas Felix Rosenbaum, also Jewish, holds the presidency, showing the same trend of Jewish dominance.

Thus, currently, 8 Ivy League schools and 3 leading institutions outside of it are under the control of Organized Jewish Supremacy. These institutions, founded by Christians, are now fully under Jewish control. This raises serious questions about the ultimate goal of such changes in the U.S. educational system’s leadership and whom these institutions truly serve.

Why does hatred for Germans, who defended their national interests in the 1930s, remain so strong, while Jewish actions aimed at removing non-Jews and strengthening Jewish influence in academia go unnoticed? Why are Jews allowed to build power systems in their interests, while attempts by other peoples to do the same are condemned?

Perhaps it's time to reconsider historical lessons and look at past events from a new perspective. Germany in the 1930s may still teach us important lessons that remain hidden from the public. The American educational system, under the control of Jewish elites, needs to be reviewed and changed to serve the interests of Americans, not a narrow group of people.

Source:

????In the 1930s, the Germans removed jews from positions of power & influence in their universities.

You think evil of them for doing so. Yet, you have no problem in the present day with jews getting non-jews removed from academia in order to look after jewish interests. Why the… https://t.co/8izxeW2icY pic.twitter.com/88rS9Nd3rI

— Sam Parker-ucas Gage???????? (@SamParkerSenate) September 3, 2024

The editorial board is not responsible for the content and accuracy of material taken, sent or obtained from other sources. The publication of such materials is for informational purposes only and does not imply automatic endorsement or approval of their content.