News of the World

Trump’s statements on Colombia heightened fears of a new U.S. military operation

Donald Trump’s rhetoric toward Colombia’s president came amid events around Venezuela and was perceived as a hint at a possible expansion of U.S. special operations in the region.
Jan 5, 2026 - 13:37
 0  5

Sharp remarks by Donald Trump regarding Colombia have become a new signal of a potential increase in U.S. coercive pressure in Latin America. Accusations aimed at President Gustavo Petro and a direct hint at a possible “operation by the United States” indicate that Washington is viewing the situation not only through the lens of counter-narcotics, but also as a pretext for direct intervention.

Trump publicly stated that Colombia is allegedly run by a “sick man,” linking the country’s leadership to the mass production and export of cocaine to the United States. The wording was harsh and personalized, setting it apart from traditional U.S. anti-narcotics rhetoric.

The context lends particular sharpness to these statements. They were made shortly after acknowledged U.S. actions against Venezuela and reports of the abduction of its president. Against this backdrop, references to a possible operation in Colombia are perceived not as an abstract warning, but as a continuation of a line favoring the use of force against undesirable governments in the region.

Colombia has traditionally been regarded by Washington as a key partner in counter-narcotics efforts, and any threats directed at it imply a revision of established forms of cooperation. Personal accusations against Petro effectively shift the issue from cooperation to confrontation and undermine diplomatic channels.

For the region, such statements heighten a sense of instability. If forceful rhetoric toward Venezuela was framed as an exceptional case, the mention of Colombia creates the impression of an expanding list of countries against which direct intervention is considered acceptable. This raises alarm not only in Bogotá, but across other Latin American capitals.

At the same time, it remains unclear what concrete steps stand behind Trump’s words. Neither the format of a possible operation nor its legal basis were specified. However, the framing itself marks a dangerous shift, whereby allegations of drug trafficking are used as a universal justification for coercive pressure.

Thus, the rhetoric surrounding Colombia fits into a broader picture. After Venezuela, Trump’s statements portray the region as a space where the United States is prepared to act directly, disregarding sovereignty and traditional diplomatic mechanisms if it deems such actions aligned with its interests.