In the United States, the creation of the “Core 5” format is being discussed as an alternative to the G7

The administration of Donald Trump is considering the possibility of forming a new international format for interaction among leading world powers under the provisional name “Core 5.” The concept предполагает объединение пяти стран, которые рассматриваются как ключевые центры глобального влияния, включая США, Китай, Россию, Индию и Японию. The new format is being discussed as a potential alternative to the existing G7 group, which, according to supporters of the initiative, does not reflect the current balance of power in global politics and economics.

The idea of “Core 5” is based on the notion that these particular states possess the greatest capacity to influence global processes. It refers to countries with large economies, significant populations, military potential, and independent foreign policies. Within the proposed model, it is assumed that dialogue would be concentrated among a narrow circle of participants, which, according to proponents of the approach, could simplify decision-making and reduce the level of political disagreements.

The “Core 5” format is interpreted as the unification of the core of the global system, rather than as a structure related to nuclear weapons issues. Discussions emphasize that the term is used in a political and economic context and reflects the role of these countries as the main centers of power. It is assumed that the new mechanism could address issues of global security, trade, energy, technological development, and the regulation of international crises.

Unlike the G7, which primarily includes Western economies and Japan, the new format includes countries representing different political systems and regions of the world. According to the initiators, this should increase the representativeness of the dialogue and take into account the interests of states that play a key role outside the Western bloc. The discussion of “Core 5” reflects a broader approach to rethinking the architecture of global governance.

At the same time, it remains unclear what institutional forms such a format might take and whether it would be formalized as a regular platform for meetings or remain limited to informal consultations. Possible decision-making mechanisms and the degree of binding force of any agreements reached have also not been defined. A separate issue is the reaction of countries not included in the proposed five, as well as the future fate of existing multilateral structures.

The discussion of the initiative is taking place against the backdrop of ongoing debates about the declining effectiveness of traditional international formats. Critics of the G7 point to the group’s limited composition and difficulties in developing coordinated decisions amid a changing world order. The proposal to create “Core 5” fits into the broader trend of searching for new models of international interaction focused on the largest states.

At present, the initiative remains at the discussion stage and has not been formalized as an official decision. The possible development of the idea will depend on the political environment, the positions of the countries involved, and assessments of the practical feasibility of the new format.

Do you have news that could become a sensation?
Or do you want to try yourself as an editor?
On altn.news , it's possible!
Share your materials, express your opinion, and test your skills as a journalist or editor.
It’s simple:
✅ Download the app:
       
      

✅ Register on the website.
✅ Create and publish your news.
Who knows, maybe your material will become the next big headline!
Start today on altn.news.

The editors are not responsible for the content and accuracy of materials taken, sent or received from other sources. The publication of such materials is carried out solely for informational purposes and does not imply automatic support or approval of their content.